Ecology of Metarhizium anisopliae in soilless potting media and the rhizosphere: implications for pest management
By D. Bruck. 2005
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06583da837fe922ce09f1d5962ecf77a6c696a62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
- S. Jaronski
- L. Lacey
- D. Shapiro-Ilan
- M. Goettel
- N. V. Meyling
- Tariq M. Butt
- J. Scheepmaker
- B. Ownley
Citations in the corpus
- Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. (2015, background): “These and other attractive plants can be used as trap crops to limit weevil distribution and 1530 egg-laying to specific areas, allowing control efforts such as M. anisopliae (Bruck, 2005; Shah et 1531 al., 2007) to be focused on the trap plants.”
- Natural and released inoculum levels of entomopathogenic fungal biocontrol agents in soil in relation to risk assessment and in accordance with EU regulations (2010, background): “In the case of coinfections, usually one fungal species dominates (Wang, Li, and Butt 2002), thereby underestimating the occurrence of the subdominant species. The temperature at which insect baiting is performed may influence which species are isolated. For example, Sookar, Bhagwant, and Awuor Ouna”
- Ecological considerations in producing and formulating fungal entomopathogens for use in insect biocontrol (2010, background): “Furthermore, the association of M. anisopliae with plant roots and root exudates supports the idea that these fungi may be capable of survival in soils without an insect host (Hu and St. Leger 2002; Bruck 2005).”
- Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology (2009, background): “Work by St. Leger (2008) and by Bruck (2005) demonstrated that persistence of M. anisopliae conidia is higher in the rhizosphere than in bulk soil but it remains to be seen whether this is a by-product of plant biology concerned with other life history traits or is an evolved response.”
- Fungal entomopathogens in the rhizosphere (2010, methodology): “These data confirm our earlier work demonstrating a significant population increase of F52 in the rhizosphere of P. abies (Bruck 2005).”
- Metarhizium anisopliae Seed Treatment Increases Yield of Field Corn When Applied for Wireworm Control (2007, background): “Alternatively, M. anisopliae has been shown to colonize the rhizosphere of plants (Hu and St. Leger, 2002; Bruck, 2005 ) and this could confer the uptake of nutrients from the soil.”
- Ecology of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae in temperate agroecosystems: Potential for conservation biological control (2007, background): “anisopliae to control insect pests in the soil (Roberts and St. Leger, 2004; Bruck, 2005).”
- A review on the genus Metarhizium as an entomopathogenic microbial biocontrol agent with emphasis on its use and utility in Mexico (2018, background): “Similar observations were reported for M. anisopliae (F52) in Picea abies, in which the fungus persisted significantly better in the rhizosphere than bulk soil (Bruck, 2005).”
- Entomopathogenic fungi as biological controllers: New insights into their virulence and pathogenicity (2012, background): “anisopliae to control insect pests in the soil (Roberts and St. Leger, 2004; Bruck, 2005).”
- Ecological factors in the inundative use of fungal entomopathogens (2010, background): “There are several estimates of the LC50 and LC95 of fungi in terms of colony forming units or spores, per cm-3 or g of soil (e.g., Ferron 1981; McDowell et al. 1990; Bruck 2005; Ekesi et al. 2002; Bruck et al. 2005).”