Environmental impacts of cultured meat production.

By Hanna Tuomisto, J. T. D. Mattos. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011

757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Food Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06574337883517ab7bcf22a9514a5d665ca55779

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Peter Alexander
2. Mark D. Rounsevell
3. Calum Brown
4. Almut Arneth
5. J. Finnigan

In Environmental Engineering

1. Mark D. Rounsevell
2. J. Finnigan
3. Dennis D. Baldocchi

Citations in the corpus

• Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? (2017, methodology): “Process efficiency values from Tuomisto and de Mattos (2011) were used as FCR, but assuming that the raw materials for the production of the culture medium is from conventional livestock feeds (Table 1).”
• Climate policy through changing consumption choices: Options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (2014, neutral): “Therefore, besides evaluating the behavioral plasticity of choices concerning high GHG options, research on the development of low GHG substitutes like in vitro meat (Tuomisto and de Mattos, 2011) and renewable (hydrogen) based airplanes (Ponater et al., 2006) is also required.”