From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries between Economics and other Social Sciences

By B. Fine, D. Milonakis. 2009

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Thirteen Things You Need to Know About Neoliberalism (2017, background): “…of ‘supply-side’ and new classical economics, new Keynesianism and new institutionalism, depending on how imperfectly working markets were conceptualized and incorporated into macroeconomic analysis (see Fine et al., 2001; Fine and Milonakis, 2009; Milonakis and Fine, 2009; Fine and Dimakou, 2016).”
Planners as Market Actors: Rethinking State–Market Relations in Land and Property (2010, background): “…in game theory (classic, evolutionary, and behavioural), complexity theory, neuroeconomics, new behavioural economics, and “infomatic economics” (Fine & Milonakis, 2009) stress, to different extents, strategic interaction, departures from constrained optimisation, and the de-emphasis or…”
Rationalities of ignorance: on financial crisis and the ambivalence of neo-liberal epistemology (2012, background): “Second, the Chicago School invested unprecedented confidence in neoclassical economics, especially in expanding it beyond the limits of ‘economic’ territory (Fine & Milonakis, 2009).”