The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version
By Ali Montazeri, M. Vahdaninia, M. Ebrahimi, S. Jarvandi. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003
728 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BackgroundThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a widely used instrument to measure psychological morbidity in cancer patients. This study aimed to translate and test the reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the HADS.MethodsThe English language version of the HADS was translated into Persian (Iranian language) and was used in this study. The questionnaire was administered to a consecutive sample of 167 breast cancer patients and statistical analysis was performed to test the reliability and validity of the HADS.ResultsIn general the Iranian version of the HADS was found to be acceptable to almost all patients (99%). Cronbach's alpha coefficient (to test reliability) has been found to be 0.78 for the HADS anxiety sub-scale and 0.86 for the HADS depression sub-scale. Validity as performed using known groups comparison analysis showed satisfactory results. Both anxiety and depression sub-scales discriminated well between sub-groups of patients differing in clinical status as defined by their disease stage.ConclusionThis preliminary validation study of the Iranian version of the HADS proved that it is an acceptable, a reliable and valid measure of psychological distress among cancer patients.
Subfields: Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0649b6abcb9b114afce355929fb914e28618ce94
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Validation study of a Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (2007, result): “24, also found in other studies (Montezeri, Vahdaninia, Ebrahimi & Jarvandi, 2003 ; Muszbek et al, 2005 ).”