Architecture and Blocking

By David Embick, Alec Marantz. Linguistic Inquiry, 2008

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0645994f50f0fbab3cf6b87b48b6eff42d956cb2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Ruth Kramer
2. Raj Singh
3. David Embick
4. Philippe Schlenker

In Cultural Studies

1. Ruth Kramer
2. Raj Singh
3. David Embick

In Language and Linguistics

1. Ruth Kramer
2. Raj Singh
3. David Embick
4. J. Merchant
5. Philippe Schlenker
6. Heidi Harley
7. R. Noyer
8. Morris Halle

Citations in the corpus

• A Split Analysis of Plurality: Number in Amharic (2016, background): “For example, -at could only be inserted in the context of a plural Num (see Embick and Marantz 2008:16–17).”
• The nanosyntax of case (2009, unknown): “72 2.6.4 Intermediate branches are not ignored . . . . . . . . . . 77 2.7 Embick & Marantz (2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”
• Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts (2011, background): “…dynamically changing contexts was to a great extent motivated by 13This move makes Revised MP rather close in spirit to a Distributed Morphology approach to blocking (e.g., Embick and Marantz (2008)), where the competition involves various Vocabulary items competing for insertion at terminal nodes.”
• Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology (2010, methodology): “For cyclic derivation, the theory presented below assumes with Marantz (2007) and Embick and Marantz (2008) thatcategory-definingheads likev, n, anda define phases.”