Auditor Style and Financial Statement Comparability
By Jere R. Francis, Matt Pinnuck, Olena V. Watanabe. 2014
298 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06314a07333a9086729ed86045f7df977603da2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Common Auditors in M&A Transactions (2016, unknown): “As discussed above, because each audit firm has a unique style of interpreting and implementing accounting rules (Francis et al., 2014; Blacconiere et al., 2011), firms can better understand the assumptions and choices underlying accounting numbers in financial statements from firms that share the…”
- The effect of accounting comparability on the accrual-based and real earnings management (2016, background): “Francis et al. (2014) document that firms’ financial statement comparability increases when they are audited by the same auditor and this effect is more pronounced for a Big 4 auditor.”
- Stock price crash risk: review of the empirical literature (2018, unknown): “Moreover, like individual CEOs, individual auditors have styles (Francis, Pinnuck, and Watanabe, 2014).”
- Seeing is believing? Executives' facial trustworthiness, auditor tenure, and audit fees (2020, unknown): “Second, each audit firm exhibits different “audit style” in terms of internal working rules, auditing standard implementation, and GAAP enforcement (Francis et al., 2013).”