Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing

By L. Phillips, C. B. E. Costa. Annals of Operations Research, 2007

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis (2009, background): “But nowhere does the literature discuss the outright decision errors that may accrue from local scaling and many researchers continue to use it as standard operating procedure (see e.g., Moshkovich et al., 2002; Roberts & Goodwin, 2002; and Phillips & Bana e Costa, 2007).”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “The reader is referred to Phillips and Bana e Costa [3] and Bana e Costa et al.”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “MCDA modeling helped inform final portfolio decisions by Allergan by prioritizing the projects on the basis of their value for money [26].”
Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment. (2012, background): “is usually achieved by decision conferencing [48,49], which involves the meeting of all the relevant stakeholders.”