Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.
By K. Steinhauser, Nicholas A. Christakis, Ec Clipp, M. McNeilly, L. McIntyre, J. Tulsky. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2000
2,508 citations recorded by the source corpus.
CONTEXT A clear understanding of what patients, families, and health care practitioners view as important at the end of life is integral to the success of improving care of dying patients. Empirical evidence defining such factors, however, is lacking. OBJECTIVE To determine the factors considered important at the end of life by patients, their families, physicians, and other care providers. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional, stratified random national survey conducted in March-August 1999. PARTICIPANTS Seriously ill patients (n = 340), recently bereaved family (n = 332), physicians (n = 361), and other care providers (nurses, social workers, chaplains, and hospice volunteers; n = 429). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Importance of 44 attributes of quality at the end of life (5-point scale) and rankings of 9 major attributes, compared in the 4 groups. RESULTS Twenty-six items consistently were rated as being important (>70% responding that item is important) across all 4 groups, including pain and symptom management, preparation for death, achieving a sense of completion, decisions about treatment preferences, and being treated as a "whole person." Eight items received strong importance ratings from patients but less from physicians (P<.001), including being mentally aware, having funeral arrangements planned, not being a burden, helping others, and coming to peace with God. Ten items had broad variation within as well as among the 4 groups, including decisions about life-sustaining treatments, dying at home, and talking about the meaning of death. Participants ranked freedom from pain most important and dying at home least important among 9 major attributes. CONCLUSIONS Although pain and symptom management, communication with one's physician, preparation for death, and the opportunity to achieve a sense of completion are important to most, other factors important to quality at the end of life differ by role and by individual. Efforts to evaluate and improve patients' and families' experiences at the end of life must account for diverse perceptions of quality. JAMA. 2000;284:2476-2482.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/062cd9d49f6b427f777b7dc85b9abdfe50ac4e9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life A Systematic Review (2008, background): “One national survey defined whether patients, caregivers, and providers have similar concerns (15), and an afterdeath survey evaluated whether health care achieves these ends (20).”
- Co‐occupation: Extending the dialogue (2009, background): “Quality of life is improved through shared end of life experience (Singer, Marin, & Kelner, 1999; Steinhauser et al., 2000).”
- Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment (2008, neutral): “ness (patients who reported that religion was “very important” were coded as “religious”),(22) and the patientphysician relationship.(23) A close patientphysician relationship was defined as one in which patients trusted and respected their physician, felt respected and “seen as a whole person,” and”