Cross-Cultural Emotion Recognition among Canadian Ethnic Groups
By Martin G. Beaupré, Ursula Hess. 2005
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0629b3489ad2e67211691ed9d07c0fd0ca1b5a73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Hillary Anger Elfenbein
- Steven G. Young
- Kurt Hugenberg
- Aida Gutiérrez-García
- Andrés Fernández-Martín
- Manuel G. Calvo
- Lauri Nummenmaa
- Marc D. Pell
In Social Psychology
- Hillary Anger Elfenbein
- Ursula Hess
- Kurt Hugenberg
- Steven G. Young
- Marc D. Pell
- Silke Paulmann
- Manuel G. Calvo
- Lauri Nummenmaa
Citations in the corpus
- Looking at You or Looking Elsewhere: The Influence of Head Orientation on the Signal Value of Emotional Facial Expressions (2007, unknown): “This procedure has been employed for the creation of standard sets of emotional facial expressions that are widely used by researchers in the field such as the JACFEE (Matsumoto and Ekman 1988) and the MSFDE (Beaupré and Hess 2005; Hess 2005).”
- The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. (2009, unknown): “(Beaupre and Hess, 2005) andmay be driven by experience (Elfenbein and Ambady, 2003) and bias (Phelps et al., 2000; Hugenberg and Bodenhausen, 2003).”
- Individuation Motivation and Face Experience Can Operate Jointly to Produce the Own-Race Bias (2012, methodology): “The images were taken from the Montreal Set of Facial Displays of Emotion (MSFDE) (Beaupré & Hess, 2005) and NIMSTIM (Tottenham et al., 2009) databases.”
- Recognizing Emotions in a Foreign Language (2009, background): “In fact, studies of both the face and voice commonly report differences in the overall degree of cross-cultural agreement witnessed across study groups and/or for specific emotion types (Beaupré and Hess 2005; Ekman et al. 1987; Matsumoto 1993; Thompson and Balkwill 2006).”
- The effect of group-identification on emotion recognition: The case of cats and basketball players (2006, background): “The MSFDE contains prototypical facial expressions that have been shown to be well recognized ( Beaupre & Hess, 2005b ) and which are highly controlled across groups, thus minimizing expressive diVerences between encoders.”
- Nonverbal Dialects and Accents in Facial Expressions of Emotion (2013, background): “…the notion that forcing stimuli to have exactly the same appearance is a cultural eraser, numerous researchers have replicated the lack of in-group advantage under these conditions (Beaupré & Hess, 2005, 2006; Kang & Lau, 2012; Lee, Chiu, & Chan, 2005; Matsumoto et al., 2009; Tracy & Robins, 2008).”
- CREMA-D: Crowd-sourced Emotional Multimodal Actors Dataset (2014, background): “They have established that prototypical basic emotions can be universally recognized by different groups of people based on the activation of specific facial expressions [1], [2], [3].”
- Recognition of Facial Expressions of Emotion is Related to their Frequency in Everyday Life (2014, background): “Frequency was significantly related to confidence judgments (Beaupré and Hess 2006), although not to judgment accuracy (Beaupré and Hess 2005).”
- Learning in emotion judgments: Training and the cross-cultural understanding of facial expressions (2006, unknown): “These expressions can be paired with stimuli from the Montreal Set of Facial Displays of Emotion (MSFDE; Beaupré & Hess, 2005) in which members of the same ethnic groups took part in a directed facial action task so that posers used a standard configuration of facial muscles regardless of their…”