Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: A new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the project design documents submitted for…

By K. Olsen, J. Fenhann. 2008

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06226eec43ccbe331636e7fbcd592f5adfbafe6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. I. Shishlov
2. D. Brescia
3. S. Subbarao
4. Patrick Nussbaumer
5. B. Lloyd
6. A. Michaelowa

Citations in the corpus

• Can the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver (2011, methodology): “…sustainable development tool; Start-up CDM in African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (Troni et al., 1997) The Gold Standard; Sustainability assessment model (Begg et al., 2003) The sustainable development benefits of Clean Development Mechanism projects as detailed by Olsen and Fenhann (2008).”
• Win-win scenarios at the climate–development interface: Challenges and opportunities for stove replacement programs through carbon finance (2012, unknown): “…environment–development win-win debates surrounding the contribution of carbon financing to both greenhouse gas emissions reductions and development (Olsen and Fenhann, 2008a,b; Wara and Victor, 2008), and emerging analyses on carbon finance and cookstoves (Bumpus, 2009) and cookstovebased…”
• On the contribution of labelled Certified Emission Reductions to sustainable development: A multi-criteria evaluation of CDM projects (2009, background): “Attempts to evaluate the contribution of CDM projects to sustainable development exist (see e.g. Olhoff et al., undated; Olsen and Fenhann, 2008; Sutter and Parreño, 2007; Policy and Operations Evaluation Department, 2008).”
• Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement (2019, methodology): “Lenzen, Schaeffer, and Matsuhashi (2007) and Olsen and Fenhann (2008) proposed the development of sophisticated tools to prioritize activities from a SD contribution standpoint that could also be used as a verification protocol for MRV on the SD impacts.”