Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity.

By David M. Amodio, James Y. Shah, Jonathan D. Sigelman, Paige C. Brazy, Eddie Harmon-Jones. 2004

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/061faa3f0d571c55bb825f03b18b466be037ec9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Cindy Harmon-Jones
2. Eddie Harmon-Jones
3. David M. Amodio
4. Eli J. Finkel
5. Immo Fritsche
6. Kyle Nash
7. A. Stanton
8. Shelley E. Taylor

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ian M McGregor
2. Cindy Harmon-Jones
3. David M. Amodio
4. Kyle Nash
5. T. Proulx
6. Eddie Harmon-Jones
7. Eli J. Finkel
8. Shelley E. Taylor

Citations in the corpus

• Offensive Defensiveness: Toward an Integrative Neuroscience of Compensatory Zeal After Mortality Salience, Personal Uncertainty, and Other Poignant Self-Threats (2006, background): “Most impressively, Amodio, Shah, Sigelman, Brazy, and Harmon-Jones (2004) recently found that promotion focus (ie, accessibility of self-ideals to approach; assessed with a lexical decision task) was positively related to EEG activity in the left frontal cortex, r = .”
• Chapter 3 Action‐Based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict (2009, background): “Amodio et al. (2004) integrated the conflict-monitoring framework with social psychological theories of selfregulation by examining conflict between automatic stereotyping tendencies and participants’ goals to respond without prejudice.”
• Anxious Uncertainty and Reactive Approach Motivation (RAM) for Religious, Idealistic, and Lifestyle Extremes (2013, background): “Contemplating ideals, a key component of an approach motivation mindset (Higgins, 1997), has been associated with approach-related EEG activity (Amodio et al., 2004).”
• Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. (2007, result): “BAS is associated with goal-directed behavior, a promotion regulatory focus (Amodio et al. 2004), and positive emotions (Davidson et al. 1990), consistent with findings reviewed above on coping processes.”
• Religious Zeal and the Uncertain Self (2008, background): “Ideals have been isolated, both theoretically and empirically, as being closely linked with approachmotivation processes (Amodio, Shah, Sigelman, Brazy, & Harmon-Jones, 2004; Higgins, 1997).”
• Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach (2014, background): “motivated (Amodio et al., 2004; Urry et al., 2004), other evidence that these salient ideology effects are approach-oriented comes from the recent finding that people with highly approach-motivated personalities adhere most to primed cultural ideals after threat (Schumann et al.”
• Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness (2010, background): “, 1998), and even neuropsychological (Amodio et al., 2004) measures have found that promotion motivations afford sensitivities for potential gains and prevention motivations afford sensitivities for potential losses (for reviews see Higgins, 1997; Molden et al.”