Classifying Political Regimes in Latin

By S. Mainwaring, Daniel M. Brinks, A. Pérez-Liñán. 2001

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0613cbddab095461b6ea6bda405467ee4a4a72e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. F. Solt
2. J. Vreeland
3. David Collier
4. J. Gandhi
5. E. Huber
6. Niklas Potrafke
7. Jessica L. P. Weeks
8. S. Afesorgbor

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Vreeland
2. David Collier
3. F. Solt
4. J. Gandhi
5. E. Huber
6. Niklas Potrafke
7. R. Mahadevan
8. S. Afesorgbor

Citations in the corpus

• Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism (2004, background): “Although both the Polity IV and Freedom House datasets have well-known flaws as measures of the quality of democracy, they remain the standards in cross-national work (see Munck and Verkuilen 2002; Mainwaring et al. 2001).”
• Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research (2001, background): “Thus, analysts who create a new indicator commonly report its correlation with previously established indicators (Bollen 1980, 380–2; Coppedge and Reincke 1990, 61; Mainwaring et al. 2001, 52; Przeworski et al. 1996, 52).”
• Democracy and dictatorship revisited (2010, background): “There are many researchers who believe it is not (e.g., Diamond 1999; Mainwaring et al. 2001; Weeden 2004).”