University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions
By Ajay Agrawal. 2001
609 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/060791df6606b6409a98221650a6f048095df3aa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Erik E. Lehmann
- Elvira Uyarra
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Evila Piva
- Albert N. Link
- Donald S. Siegel
- Marcel Hülsbeck
- Reinhilde Veugelers
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Elvira Uyarra
- Erik E. Lehmann
- Einar Rasmussen
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Evila Piva
- Donald S. Siegel
- Albert N. Link
- M. Mathisen
In Strategy and Management
- Evila Piva
- Elvira Uyarra
- Albert N. Link
- Donald S. Siegel
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Einar Rasmussen
- Erik E. Lehmann
- Reinhilde Veugelers
Citations in the corpus
- Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany (2011, positive): “In this transmission process TTO are of great importance (Bercovitz et al. 2001; Agrawal 2001).”
- The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis (2010, background): “In particular, prior studies have shown that university policies regarding intellectual property, licensing strategies and characteristics of technology transfer offices may affect university-to-industry knowledge transfer (for a review of these studies see again Agrawal 2001 ).”
- A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship (2014, background): “…Hagedoorn et al. 2000, Audretsch and Feldman 2003), and fostering joint ventures between/among entrepreneurs and universities or research labs (e.g., Stiglitz and Wallsten 1999, Agrawal 2001, OECD 2002, Poyago-Theotoky et al. 2002, McMillan and Hamilton 2003, Hall 2004, Mowery and Nelson 2004).”
- The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria (2015, background): “University entrepreneurial activities are considered being affected by national policy aspects, such as funding and intellectual property rights (IPRs) (Agrawal, 2001).”
- Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “…length of the agreement, their suitability for transferring tacit knowledge, the “relational involvement” of the interactions, etc. (Bonaccorsi & Piccaluga, 1994; Faulkner & Senker, 1994; Meyer-Krahmer & Schmoch, 1998; Agrawal, 2001; Cohen et al., 2002; Schartinger, 2002; Perkmann & Walsh, 2007).”
- University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007, neutral): “Funding provided by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) via the Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM).”
- The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review (2019, methodology): “Literature Search We first consulted prior literature reviews within academic entrepreneurship and technology transfer (Agrawal, 2001; Bozeman, 2000; Djokovic and Souitaris, 2008; Geuna and Muscio, 2009; Hayter, 2013; Kirchberger and Pohl, 2016; Kochenkova et al., 2016; O'Shea et al., 2008;…”
- In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links (2008, background): “Further, 71% of the inventions licensed required cooperation between the professor and the licensing firm in order to commercialize a product successfully (see Agrawal, 2001).”