Species resistance and community response to wind disturbance regimes in northern temperate forests

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Divergence from the growth–survival trade‐off and extreme high growth rates drive patterns of exotic tree invasions in closed‐canopy forests (2010, background): “Each scenario was simulated with and without a disturbance regime: at years 150 and 300, 100% of adults (‡ 10 cm d.b.h.) in one-quarter of the area were killed, an event analogous to an intermediate-severity windstorm (Papaik & Canham 2006).”
Functional traits and local environment predict vegetation responses to disturbance: a pan‐European multi‐site experiment (2011, background): “Disturbance is one of the most important factors structuring communities in terrestrial ecosystems (Pickett & White 1985; Papaik & Canham 2006).”
Wind‐throw mortality in the southern boreal forest: effects of species, diameter and stand age (2007, background): “2001; Papaik & Canham 2006).”
Long-term hurricane damage effects on tropical forest tree growth and mortality (2014, background): “Most studies are done within a few years of the impact of a cyclone (called hurricanes in the Atlantic), and describe the form of damage and differences between species in damage and mortality (e.g., in Jamaica, Bellingham et al. [1995]; in Puerto Rico, USA, Ostertag et al. [2005]; see Everham and B”