Normal impact of a liquid drop on a dry surface: model for spreading and receding
By Ilia V. Roisman, R. Rioboo, Cameron Tropea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2002
430 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05e5f673ee28820775d2c9cb631525bc4cf26d29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
In Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Citations in the corpus
- A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. (2016, background): “As these properties are important for the droplet formation [76e78], properties of the substrate is also important as the factors including but not limited to wettability of the surface, surface roughness as well as viscous forces [79].”
- Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance (2017, neutral): “There are a few theoretical studies attempted to correlate the surface roughness with drop spreading and retraction (Bussmann et al., 2000; Kim and Chun, 2001; Roisman et al., 2002).”
- Time evolution of liquid drop impact onto solid, dry surfaces (2002, background): “Note that this concept of advancing and receding diameters was alluded to in Schiaffino and Sonin (1997), but was not evaluated quantitatively.”
- Lattice Boltzmann simulations of micron-scale drop impact on dry surfaces (2010, methodology): “When the contact line moves, as in drop spreading and recoil, the dynamic contact angle reconstructed from the ‘‘Hoffman’s function” [17] and capillary number [18–20] was imposed as an input parameter in order to interpolate the values in the tabulated external force field.”
- Retraction dynamics of aqueous drops upon impact on non-wetting surfaces (2005, background): “indeed already suggested by previous observations of a clear disagreement between experiments and the Rmax/RI ∝ We law (Fukai et al. 1993; Roisman et al. 2002; Okumura et al. 2003).”