From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China's Urban Development
By Jieming Zhu. 2004
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Soil Science, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05d82539d3494bb363958d06839286f2688e6911
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Soil Science
In Urban Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region (2008, background): “…extensive discussions (Ho, 2005; Ho and Lin, 2003; Ho and Spoor, 2006; Hsing, 2006; Lin, 2001; Lin and Ho, 2005; Wong and Zhao, 1999; Wu, 2002; Zhu, 2004, 2005).1 Following the state/institutionscentred approach (Lin, 1999; Ma, 2002, 2005; Peck, 2001, 2003) on this issue, we basically agree…”
- Urbanization of Capital or Capitalization on Urban Land? Land Development and Local Public Finance in Urbanizing China (2011, background): “…have been made to apply certain influential Western political and economic theories, including capital switching, urban growth machine, urban regime, and neoliberalism to explain China’s ongoing urban transformation (Zhu, 2002, 2004; Ma and Wu, 2005; McGee et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2007; Wu, 2008).”
- Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China (2017, background): “Local governments have monopolized the requisition of rural land and the supply of land for urban construction (Zhu, 2004; Zhu, 2005), and rural land cannot be used for commercial purposes until it has been requested by local governments and transferred from collective to state ownership.”
- The Emerging Housing Policy Framework in China (2011, background): “Thus, pursuing the lucrative profits from land sales has become a top priority for local governments, which has led to the unprecedented housing development boom in Chinese history (Ding 2003; Zhang and Pearlman 2004; J. Zhu 2004; S.-M. Li 2005).”
- The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights (2008, background): “Insecure property rights in land markets tend to induce short-term rather than long-term investments (Zhu, 2004).”
- Economic transition, spatial development and urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China (2017, background): “First, the land market has both social and economic importance for individual initiatives and consequent competition (Zhu, 2004a).”
- Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies (2009, background): “characterised China’s local state-led development as local state corporatism (Oi, 1995), state entrepreneurialism (Duckett, 1998) and local developmental statism (Zhu, 2004b), all focusing on the entrepreneurial nature of local state activities geared towards local economic growth.”
- Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen (2009, background): “All land under the village’s control was owned collectively by the village, though families could be responsible for the cultivation of specific plots of land (F. Wu, 1999; 2002; 2004; Cartier, 2001; Zhu, 2004; 2005; Ho and Lin, 2003; 2004; Ding, 2004; Deng and Huang, 2004; Yeh, 2005).”
- Property Rights Redistribution, Entitlement Failure and the Impoverishment of Landless Farmers in China (2009, background): “However, since the property rights of China’s land have long lacked clarity of definition, ownership disputes occur among state institutions, between the state and the collective, and among the collectives (Ho, 2005; Zhu, 2004).”
- Economic transition and urban land expansion in Provincial China (2014, unknown): “As Zhu (2004) noted, those governments having economic and technology development zones (ETDZs) in the jurisdiction were much more competitive than other governments in attracting foreign investment that most development zones became the focus of industrial development and urban expansion in…”