Emotional Risks to Respondents in Survey Research: Some Empirical Evidence
By S. Labott, T. Johnson, M. Fendrich, N. Feeny. 2013
61 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Some survey research has documented distress in respondents with pre-existing emotional vulnerabilities, suggesting the possibility of harm. In this study, respondents were interviewed about a personally distressing event; mood, stress, and emotional reactions were assessed. Two days later, respondents participated in interventions to either enhance or alleviate the effects of the initial interview. Results indicated that distressing interviews increased stress and negative mood, although no adverse events occurred. Between the interviews, moods returned to baseline. Respondents who again discussed a distressing event reported moods more negative than those who discussed a neutral or a positive event. This study provides evidence that, among nonvulnerable survey respondents, interviews on distressing topics can result in negative moods and stress, but they do not harm respondents.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Irene Solaiman
- Marie-Therese Png
- Zeerak Talat
- Yacine Jernite
- Alexandra Sasha Luccioni
- Su Lin Blodgett
- Margaret Mitchell
In Social Sciences & Humanities
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “Evaluating the effect AI has on people and societies, and evaluating people and groups themselves encounters similar challenges as those arising in sampling [20], surveying [126], determining preferences [270], and working with human subjects [131, 12], in addition to challenges that stem from the p”