Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke
By Joseph Broderick, Y. Palesch, A. Demchuk, S. Yeatts, P. Khatri, Michael D. Hill, E. Jauch, T. Jovin, B. Yan, F. Silver and 19 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
1,849 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BACKGROUND Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8–19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (−1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, −10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P = 0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.)
Subfields: Cancer Research, Epidemiology, Hematology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05d3354de9577ba79f33f1bc06d9e2aeb63f57c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
Citations in the corpus
- Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. (2015, neutral): “Myocardial infarction 11/97 (11) 8/98 (8)”
- Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Consensus Statement (2013, methodology): “The only grading scale explicitly intended to measure the degree of recanalization at the TAL is the Arterial Occlusive Lesion (AOL) scale, which was proposed by the IMS investigators (Table 3).(5,12,18,42,43) AOL describes arterial patency at the site of occlusion based on the degree of luminal ope”
- Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. (2015, background): “All rights reserved. n engl j med nejm.org 11 ewan, Saskatoon (M.K.), the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON (J.L.M.), and the Department of Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (J.S.) — all in Canada; the Departments of Neuroradiology (J.”
- Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke (2018, positive): “As defined by individual studies, the incidences of SICH following endovascular revascularization range from 2% to 10% for combined intravenous and intraarterial thrombolytic trials (9,12,39,122) and from 1% to 8% for EVT trials (7,11,13,20,121).”