Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance

By Sebastian Ebert, Daniel Wiesen. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2014

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05bfb87f2db12562b766ff1c53fb0af117199bc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Xavier Gassmann
2. Thomas Meissner
3. Corinne Faure
4. J. Schleich

In Safety Research

1. J. Schleich

Citations in the corpus

• Consistency of Higher Order Risk Preferences (2012, unknown): “The paper by Ebert and Wiesen (2012) purports to use their experimental data to show that cumulative prospect theory (Tversky and Kahneman (1992)) has the best “fit” for explaining their prudence and their temperance.”
• Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate (2016, background): “Prudence has been shown to explain individuals’ decisions in laboratory experiments quite well (Ebert and Wiesen, 2014) but has not yet been considered in an EET adoption context.”