A Summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design

By K. Taylor, R. Stouffer, Gerald A. Meehl, P. Cox, Veronika Eyring, G. Flato, N. Gillett, Marco A. Giorgetta, B. Govindasamy, Wilco Hazeleger and 19 more. 2010

496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05a25892095195965b57280b93f6ff41b2b20b14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Climate Change, Global Food Security, and the U.S. Food System (2015, background): “26 (fifth) phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5; Taylor et al. 2012), which provides a coordinated suite of experiments that form the basis for the results described in the 5th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; Stocker et al.”
An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design (2012, methodology): “For detailed specifications of all the experiments, the reader is referred to the experiment design document (Taylor et al. 2009), which can be obtained from the CMIP5 website (http://cmip-pcmdi.”
Challenges in Combining Projections from Multiple Climate Models (2010, methodology): “Models have been evaluated on many different quantities but mostly on the present-day mean climate and variability; however, for the upcoming CMIP5-coordinated model experiments, paleoclimate simulations will be used for the first time as a standard part of the evaluation process (Taylor et al. 2009”
The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation (2013, background): “In the context of the forthcoming CMIP5 exercise (Taylor et al. 2009), a new version, namely CNRM-CM5.”
The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and Pilot Studies (2013, unknown): “To ensure that climate and agricultural scenarios are not contradictory, the basis for the RAPs is the set of SRES emissions scenarios and RCPs used in the IPCC AR4 and AR5, respectively (SRES, 2000; Taylor et al., 2009).”
Climate and socio-economic scenarios for climate change research and assessment: reconciling the new with the old (2014, unknown): “Meanwhile, climate modellers have already generated new climate projections based on the RCPs (e.g., Taylor et al. 2012), while some IAV modellers have produced initial impact estimates (e.g., Hanasaki et al. 2013; Portmann et al. 2013).”
EC-Earth V2.2: description and validation of a new seamless earth system prediction model (2012, methodology): “For instance, as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5, Taylor et al. 2011) initialized decadal hindcasts and forecasts are made, as well as climate projections with different concentration scenarios.”
Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6 (2020, result): “5) forcing protocols and are thus directly comparable to corresponding CMIP5 simulations (Taylor et al., 2007).”
Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there (2013, methodology): “[15] The new generation of global climate models in CMIP5 supports the idea of a rather gradual evolutionary process by which models improve over time.”
Skill of CMIP5 climate models in reproducing 20th century basic climate features in Central America (2015, methodology): “Detailed explanation of the difference between the runs can be found in the study by Taylor et al. (2012a).”
The Shared Socio-economic Pathways : Trajectories for human development and global environmental change (2017, background): “, 2011) and the subsequent changes in the climate system (Taylor et al., 2012).”