Simultaneous modelling of the Cholesky decomposition of several covariance matrices
By Mohsen Pourahmadi, Michael J. Daniels, Trevor Park. 2007
69 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Food Science, Genetics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/059d38f4f1e094bdfb1e53bb4b83d5af746318b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Food Science
- Paul David McNicholas
- Christopher K. Wikle
- Scott H. Holan
- Peter D. Hoff
- Wagner Hugo Bonat
- Jonathan R. Bradley
- Bent Jørgensen
- Sylvain Calinon
In Genetics
- Paul David McNicholas
- Christopher K. Wikle
- Scott H. Holan
- Wagner Hugo Bonat
- Jonathan R. Bradley
- Bent Jørgensen
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Paul David McNicholas
- Christopher K. Wikle
- Scott H. Holan
- Wagner Hugo Bonat
- Jonathan R. Bradley
- Bent Jørgensen
- Mario V. Wüthrich
Citations in the corpus
- Multivariate covariance generalized linear models (2015, methodology): “The modified Cholesky decomposition proposed by Pourahmadi et al. (2007) presents both features, but is restricted to the case where there is a natural ordering of the observations.”
- Model-Based Clustering (2016, methodology): “Pourahmadi, Daniels, and Park (2007) develop a method of simultaneously modelling several covariance matrices based on this decomposition, thereby giving an alternative to common principal components analysis (Flury 1988) for longitudinal data.”
- Bayesian Hierarchical Models With Conjugate Full-Conditional Distributions for Dependent Data From the Natural Exponential Family (2017, methodology): “Furthermore, the prior distributions similar to those used by Daniels and Pourahmadi (2002), Chen and Dunson (2003), and Pourahmadi et al. (2007) are adapted to the non-Gaussian setting.”
- A Covariance Regression Model (2011, background): “f observations for each combination of explanatory variables may be quite small, making it impractical to estimate a separate covariance matrix for each group. One strategy, taken by Flury (1984) and Pourahmadi et al. (2007), is to assume that a particular feature of the covariance matrices (princip”