Collective flow in p-Pb and d-Pb collisions at TeV energies
By Piotr Bozek. 2011
282 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We apply the hydrodynamic model for the dynamics of matter created in p-Pb collisions at 4.4TeV and d-Pb collisions at 3.11TeV. The fluctuating initial conditions are calculated in the Glauber Monte-Carlo model for several centrality classes. The expansion is performed event by event in 3+1-dimensional viscous hydrodynamics. Noticeable elliptic and triangular flows appear in the distributions of produced particles.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0598fdb81c9cf4e8018b073e6b3bd44fa327a2df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Observation of long-range, near-side angular correlations in pPb collisions at the LHC (2012, background): “Long-range correlations in pPb collisions have been quantitatively predicted in models assuming a collective hydrodynamic expansion [25].”
- Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at root S-NN=5.02 TeV (2012, background): “Reference [34] gives predictions for two-particle correlations arising from collective flow in p–Pb collisions at the LHC in the framework of a hydrodynamical model.”
- Mapping the phases of quantum chromodynamics with beam energy scan (2019, background): “While it is still being debated if the origin of these correlations is hydrodynamic evolution as it is in nucleus-nucleus collisions [300–302], it is interesting to see if these flow-like correlations disappear at lower collision energies.”
- Relativistic Fluid Dynamics in and out of Equilibrium (2017, unknown): “Indeed, hydrodynamic model results in small systems have proven just as successful as in more traditional large heavy-ion collisions systems [240, 244, 356, 401–406].”
- Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions (2018, background): “, (54)) and the inability to determine whether there was a contribution on the away side underneath the dijet signal, there was speculation of possible new physics at play having nothing to do with the initial geometry followed by collective expansion.”