Electrofishing Effort Requirements for Assessing Species Richness and Biotic Integrity in Western Oregon Streams

By L. Reynolds, A. Herlihy, P. Kaufmann, S. Gregory, R. Hughes. 2003

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Structured Approach for Developing Indices of Biotic Integrity: Three Examples from Streams and Rivers in the Western USA (2007, background): “In wadeable streams vertebrates were sampled in a reach with length 40 times the average wetted stream width, a reach length demonstrated to collect 90% of potential fish species (Reynolds et al. 2003).”
A review of existing fish assemblage indicators and methodologies (2007, background): “…river reach they belong to, and in particular they must encompass several riffle-pool sequences (or meander wavelength) and represent the variety of habitat types (for example Fausch et al. 1984; Angermeier & Karr 1986; Lyons et al. 1995; Langdon 2001; Hughes et al. 2002; Reynolds et al. 2003).”
A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. (2004, background): “Variation in natural phenomena, sampling strategy and differences in operator efficiency have also been highlighted as potential sources of bias that may lead to misinterpretation (Gammon and Simon, 2000; Fore et al., 2001; Clarke et al., 2002; Dauwalter and Pert, 2003; Reynolds et al., 2003).”