Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality
By James D. Abbey, Margaret G. Meloy. 2017
454 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05816c7392d72ba3182161342b36e6e6cb89d182
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Controlling social desirability bias (2018, background): “An attention check was included to improve response quality (Abbey & Meloy, 2017).”
- On making experimental design choices: Discussions on the use and challenges of demand effects, incentives, deception, samples, and vignettes (2020, result): “While some studies have reported increased attentiveness of MTurk samples as compared to student samples (Klein et al., 2014; Hauser & Schwarz, 2016), the use of attention checks with any sample is an important experimental protocol (Abbey & Meloy, 2017; Kane & Barabas, 2019).”
- On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “For sake of transparency, scholars should also report all the manipulation checks they conducted in an experiment, and thus disclose all possible sources of demands in their study (Abbey & Meloy, 2017).”