Gini’s nuclear family

By Rolf Aaberge. 2007

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/057f5135329b2420173b1d97478655f800a53ce9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Magne Mogstad
2. Rolf Aaberge
3. Manudeep Bhuller
4. Audun Langørgen
5. V. Peragine
6. John E. Roemer
7. Alain Trannoy
8. Daniele Checchi

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Magne Mogstad
2. V. Peragine
3. Manudeep Bhuller
4. Audun Langørgen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Magne Mogstad
2. V. Peragine
3. Rolf Aaberge
4. Manudeep Bhuller
5. Audun Langørgen
6. Marc Fleurbaey
7. Gaston Yalonetzky
8. Alain Trannoy

Citations in the corpus

• The Distributional Impact of Public Services When Needs Differ (2010, methodology): “As demonstrated by Aaberge (2007), an alternative approach for examining inequality in the distribution of income is to rely on Gini’s Nuclear Family defined by (3.1) ( ) 1 2 0 ( ) ( ) , 1,2,3kkC F k u u L u du k −= − = where C1 is equivalent to a measure of inequality that was proposed by…”
• Measuring Long-Term Inequality of Opportunity (2011, methodology): “…by the Gini coefficient it appears attractive to use members of the rank- dependent family 1 2 kk p C J , k , ,..., where (3.4) 1 1 1 2 3 1 k k log v, k p ( v ) k v , k , ,.... k 12 As indicated by Aaberge (2000, 2007) the family : 1,2,...kC k uniquely determines the Lorenz curve L .”