Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns
By Elena G. Irwin, N. Bockstael. 2002
450 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0579d658541725ac31d258d21bb8d1e7db25990e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- D. Lewis
- Elena G. Irwin
- Stephen Polasky
- Andrew J. Plantinga
- Kathleen Segerson
- Mark D. Rounsevell
- J. Geoghegan
- N. Bockstael
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling and Managing Urban Growth at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A Parcel-Level Model of Residential Land Use Change (2003, background): “As Irwin and Bockstael (2002a) discuss, both positive and negative spillovers can be expected.”
- Compactness versus Sprawl (2015, background): “This can lead to underreporting of low-density urban forms and can bias thresholds used to classify different land covers (Irwin and Bockstael 2002).”
- Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl (2004, methodology): “We do so by building on the optimal timing of development model developed in Irwin and Bockstael (2002), which incorporates the effects of land use externalities and is estimated using a hazard model of development.”
- Contagious development: Neighbor interactions in deforestation (2012, background): “Land-use research has focused on spatial externalities in residential development (Irwin and Bockstael, 2002) and on information networks that may affect technology adoption in agriculture (Case, 1992, and Conley and Udry, 2001).”
- Land Use Regulation and Welfare (2014, unknown): “, Irwin and Bockstael (2002) or for a survey, McConnell and Walls (2005). We now define the V(x; ·) term in our original formulation of utility as V(x; ·) = VO(x,z,z)1VE(x,z,z)2 and write utility as”
- NEW DIRECTIONS FOR URBAN ECONOMIC MODELS OF LAND USE CHANGE: INCORPORATING SPATIAL DYNAMICS AND HETEROGENEITY (2010, methodology): “This two-step approach has been used to model urbanization and sprawl (e.g., Irwin and Bockstael, 2002; Carrion-Flores and Irwin, 2004); the effects of land policies on urbanization patterns (e.g., Irwin, Bell, and Geoghegan, 2003; Irwin and Bockstael, 2004; Newburn and Berck, 2006; Langpap,…”
- Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science (2007, background): “…to test specific hypotheses, they can help to develop general models of decision-making processes such as learning processes, decision-making in social dilemmas, preference utility functions, and bounded rationality (e.g. Castillo and Saysel 2005, Deadman 1999, Duffy 2006, Jager and Janssen 2002).”
- Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review (2003, background): “…use of spatial statistical approaches (point-pattern and landscape metrics) to compare modeled outcomes and data (White and Engelen 1993; Batty and Xie 1994; Alberti and Waddell 2000; Manson 2000; Parker 2000; Herold and Menz 2001; Parker, Evans, and Meretsky 2001; Irwin and Bockstael 2002).”
- Temporal and spatial modelling of tropical deforestation: a survival analysis linking satellite and household survey data (2002, background): “Models that include the temporal dimension as well as location of land-use change have focused on urban fringe development in the United States (Geoghegan and Bockstael, 2000; Irwin and Bockstael, 2002).”