What should a statistical mechanics satisfy to reflect nature

By Constantino Tsallis. 2004

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There is no compelling reason imposing that the methods of statistical mechanics should be restricted to the dynamical systems which follow the usual Boltzmann–Gibbs prescriptions. More specifically, ubiquitous natural and artificial systems exhibit generic stationary states which are not ergodic nor close to it, in any geometrically simple subset of the a priori allowed phase space, in any (even extended) trivial sense. A vast class of such systems appears, nevertheless, to be tractable within thermostatistical methods completely analogous to the usual ones. The question posed in the title arises then naturally. Some answer to this complex question is advanced in the present review of nonextensive statistical mechanics and its recent connections.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0575c59344e5b256d648d0a405872f64b621a931

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Arak M. Mathai
  2. Hans J. Haubold

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Hans J. Haubold
  2. Arak M. Mathai
  3. Seema S. Nair
  4. Hari M. Srivastava
  5. Sergei Rogosin
  6. R. K. Saxena
  7. Mathieu Rosenbaum
  8. Arran Fernandez

Citations in the corpus