Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony

By Robyn Carston, C. Wearing. 2015

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Hyperbolic use of language is very frequent but has seldom been thought worthy of serious analytical attention. Hyperbole is usually treated as a minor trope which belongs with one or the other of the two dominant figurative uses of language, metaphor and irony. In this paper, we examine the range of ways in which hyperbole is manifest, in both its ‘pure’ uses and its prevalent co-occurrences with other tropes. We conclude that it does not align closely with either metaphor or irony but is a distinctive figure of speech in its own right, characterized by the blatant exaggeration of a relevant scalar property for the purpose of expressing an evaluation of a state of affairs. The relative simplicity of hyperbole enables its exploitation of a range of independent mechanisms of non-literal linguistic communication including loose use, metaphor, simile, and expressions of ironical and other attitudes.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/056a5405d4664465e56b16ce3523598ad3a8c0f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony (2016, background): “Various scholars have noted that the various figures can be closely related (cf. Averbeck, 2015; Gibbs, 2000), and often occur together in discourse (Kreuz, Roberts, Johnson, & Bertus, 1996), but, at the same time, each of the three figures is also clearly distinct (cf. Carston & Wearing, 2015).”