Testing one hypothesis twice in observational studies
By Paul R. Rosenbaum. 2012
46 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0567ef7f07e9ef29f4aefc6ae4e9cca3d4db35b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dylan S. Small
- José R. Zubizarreta
- J. Hsu
- Paul R. Rosenbaum
- R. Paredes
- Peng Ding
- Xinran Li
- Luke Keele
In Statistics and Probability
- José R. Zubizarreta
- Luke Keele
- Peng Ding
- Paul R. Rosenbaum
- Dylan S. Small
- Xinran Li
- J. Hsu
- R. Paredes
Citations in the corpus
- Optimal Multilevel Matching in Clustered Observational Studies: A Case Study of the School Voucher System in Chile (2014, background): “Following Zubizarreta (2012), these specifications for covariate balance may not only require mean balance, but perhaps also other forms of distributional balance such as fine balance (Rosenbaum et al. 2007), x-fine balance (Zubizarreta et al. 2011), and strength-k matching (Hsu et al. 2014).”
- Matching for Balance, Pairing for Heterogeneity in an Observational Study of the Effectiveness of For-Profit and Not-For-Profit High Schools in Chile (2014, background): “Under H0, Λ = 2 means that an imbalance in u at most doubles the odds of treatment, Zi1 − Zi2 = 1, while ∆ = 2 means that u at most doubles the odds of a positive response difference, Yi > 0, and the parameter ∆ is defined in terms of Wolfe’s (1974) semiparametric family of deformations of a distrib”
- Effect Modification and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies (2013, methodology): “Again, this is expected in large samples because the combination of four tests has the same design sensitivity as the best of the four individual tests (Rosenbaum 2012, proposition 2).”
- General Forms of Finite Population Central Limit Theorems with Applications to Causal Inference (2016, methodology): “→ Nd (0,Vρ ∞). Note that the first condition in (19) is ensured by (18), and the second condition in (19) holds automatically as argued in (17). To determine the rejection region for (T,W), similar to Rosenbaum (2012), we introduce 1−γρ(c), the probability of the 2-dimensional lower orthant (−∞,c]×(−”