Calculations of mixing enthalpy and mismatch entropy for ternary amorphous alloys : Special issue on bulk amorphous, nano-crystalline and nano-quasicrystalline alloys

By Akira Takeuchi, A. Inoue. 2000

809 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Chemical mixing enthalpy (ΔH chem ) and mismatch entropy normalized by Boltzmann constant (S σ /k B ) corresponding to the three empirical rules for the achievement of high amorphous-forming ability (AFA) were calculated with thermodynamical functions for the gross number of 6450 alloys in 351 ternary amorphous systems. The temary amorphous alloys have ΔH chem of -86 to 25 kJ/mol and S σ /k B of 1.0 × 10 -3 to 5.7. The average values of ΔH chem and S σ /k B are calculated to be -33 kJ/mol and 0.33, respectively. The 30 alloys in 9 ternary amorphous systems including 10 alloys in Ag-Cu-Fe system have positive values of ΔH chem . Most of the ternary amorphous alloys have the values of ΔH chem and S σ /k B inside a trapezoid regicn in ΔH chem - log(S σ /k B ) chart except mainly for the H- and the C-containing alloys. Si-W-Zr system and the 32 alloys having positive values of ΔH chem . The analysis of AFA was carried out for typical five ternary amorphous systems. The following four results are derived. 1) Al-La-Ni and B-Fe-Zr alloys have high AFA in accordance with the concept of the three empirical rules. 2) The further multiplication of alloy components causes an increase in the AFA of Al-B-Fe alloys. 3) Thermodynamical factors represented by melting temperature and viscosity at the melting temperature are required for evaluation of AFA for Mg- and Pd-based amorphous alloys. 4) A tendency for log(S σ /k B ) to increase with decreasing ΔH chem is recognized in each alloys system, implying the stabilization of an amorphous phase against solid solution and intermediate phase.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0564d28ca69a9497706ce355b6c566da47a82219

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Daniel B. Miracle
  2. Oleg N. Senkov
  3. C. Liu
  4. Sheng Guo
  5. T. Nieh
  6. Wei Ji
  7. Chao Wang
  8. Zhengyi Fu

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. Daniel B. Miracle
  2. Oleg N. Senkov
  3. Sheng Guo
  4. C. Liu
  5. T. Nieh
  6. Jien‐Wei Yeh
  7. Chun Ng
  8. P. K. Liaw

Citations in the corpus