Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients.

By E. Boersma. European Heart Journal, 2006

662 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. (2012, positive): “trials, a benefit of primary PCI over fibrinolytic therapy was calculated, up to a PCI-related delay of 120 min.(66) In 192 509 patients”
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. (2008, methodology): “In another analysis of these trials, a benefit of primary PCI over fibrinolytic therapy up to a PCI-related delay of 120 min was calculated.(40) In 192 509 patients included in the NRMI 2-4 registry,(41) the mean PCI-related time delay where mortality rates of the two reperfusion strategies were equ”