Continuity, deconfinement, and (super) Yang-Mills theory

By E. Poppitz, T. Schäfer, M. Unsal. 2012

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A bstractWe study the phase diagram of SU(2) Yang-Mills theory with one adjoint Weyl fermion on $ {{\mathbb{R}}^3}\times {{\mathbb{S}}^1} $ as a function of the fermion mass m and the compactification scale L. This theory reduces to thermal pure gauge theory as m → ∞ and to circle-compactified (non-thermal) supersymmetric gluodynamics in the limit m → 0. In the m-L plane, there is a line of center-symmetry changing phase transitions. In the limit m → ∞, this transition takes place at Lc = 1/Tc, where Tc is the critical temperature of the deconfinement transition in pure Yang-Mills theory. We show that near m = 0, the critical compactification scale Lc can be computed using semi-classical methods and that the transition is of second order. This suggests that the deconfining phase transition in pure Yang-Mills theory is continuously connected to a transition that can be studied at weak coupling. The center-symmetry changing phase transition arises from the competition of perturbative contributions and monopole-instantons that destabilize the center, and topological molecules (neutral bions) that stabilize the center. The contribution of molecules can be computed using supersymmetry in the limit m = 0, and via the Bogomolnyi-Zinn-Justin (BZJ) prescription in non-supersymmetric gauge theory. Finally, we also give a detailed discussion of an issue that has not received proper attention in the context of N = 1 theories — the non-cancellation of nonzero-mode determinants around supersymmetric BPS and KK monopole-instanton backgrounds on $ {{\mathbb{R}}^3}\times {{\mathbb{S}}^1} $. We explain why the non-cancellation is required for consistency with holomorphy and supersymmetry and perform an explicit calculation of the one-loop determinant ratio.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/053af87db42dc6b14eccc4388f2731e97a4c1422

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. G. Dunne
  2. M. Unsal
  3. R. Schiappa
  4. Sara Pasquetti

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. G. Dunne
  2. M. Unsal
  3. Daniele Dorigoni
  4. P. Argyres
  5. Simon Catterall
  6. D. Kaplan
  7. R. Schiappa
  8. Sara Pasquetti

Citations in the corpus