Contemporary public sector accounting research – An international comparison of journal papers

By A. Goddard. 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0527ba0c036fdbf98e58999724275648c1bf5293

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. J. V. Helden
2. P. Adhikari
3. Sumohon Matilal
4. C. Kuruppu
5. D. Hay
6. C. Cordery
7. Shahzad Uddin
8. Trevor Hopper

In Management Information Systems

1. J. V. Helden
2. Sumohon Matilal
3. D. Hay
4. C. Cordery
5. Shahzad Uddin
6. C. Kuruppu
7. P. Adhikari
8. Trevor Hopper

In Public Administration

1. J. V. Helden
2. D. Hay
3. C. Cordery
4. Shahzad Uddin
5. P. Adhikari

Citations in the corpus

• The value of public sector audit: Literature and history (2018, background): “As Goddard (2010) observes, there is a wide gulf between two approaches to research about accounting in the public sector, the alternative and the mainstream approaches.”
• Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalese and Sri Lankan central governments (2013, background): “The extant literature argues that neo-institutional theory has become a key theoretical lens through which to explore the choice of accounting practices in the public sector (Goddard, 2010; Jacobs, 2012).”
• Public sector management accounting in emerging economies: A literature review (2016, methodology): “Public-sector management accounting (PSMA) research has been reviewed extensively (Broadbent & Guthrie, 1992, 2008; Goddard, 2010; van Helden, 2005).”