Firm productivity, heterogeneity, sunk costs and market selection

By José C. Fariñas, Sonia Ruano. 2005

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/051bf2f9975af9a5b8ce692c809ed8614d7c1a54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms (2010, methodology): “In particular for Spain, Fariñas and Ruano (2005) show that continuing firms are systematically more efficient than exiting and new firms. to export next period than firms that do not innovate, while firms that improve their production process are 3% more likely to export than those that do not inn”
Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment (2015, unknown): “3 See, for example, Leahy and Whited (1996), Ghosal and Loungani (1996), Minton and Schrand (1999), Bond and Cummins (2004), Bloom et al.”
Exports, imports and firm survival: first evidence for manufacturing enterprises in Germany (2012, background): “2 For surveys see Greenaway and Kneller (2007) and Wagner (2007). 3 Studies include Amiti and Konings (2007), Kasahara and Rodrigue (2007), Halpern et al.”
The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: the case of Germany (2006, background): “The regional level of labor productivity that seems to be important for the effects of new businesses is mainly shaped by the incumbent businesses and not by the new firms, which tend to enter at a below-average productivity level (Bartelsman and Doms 2000; Farinas and Ruano 2005).”
Economic Policy Uncertainty And Corporate Cash Holdings (2017, unknown): “Following Gulen and Ion (2016), we adopt four measures of investment irreversibility, including (i) capital intensity ratio given by net PPE divided by total assets (PPE); (ii) industry-level redeployability of assets (AR) using 1997 capital flows table from the Bureau of Economic Analysis; (iii) an”
Beyond The Average Effects: The Distributional Impacts of Export Promotion Programs in Developing Countries (2010, methodology): “…set of firms and cannot accordingly be considered independent, we have performed the test both for the pooled sample and for each sample year (see Fariñas and Ruano, 2005). the distribution of intensive margin indicators (average exports per country, average exports per product, and average…”