Observational constraints on interacting quintessence models
By G. Olivares, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Pavón. 2005
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We determine the range of parameter space of an Interacting Quintessence Model that best fits the recent WMAP measurements of Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies. We only consider cosmological models with zero spatial curvature. We show that if the quintessence scalar field decays into cold dark matter at a rate that brings the ratio of matter to dark energy constant at late times, the cosmological parameters required to fit the CMB data are: dark energy density {omega}{sub x}=0.43{+-}0.12, baryon fraction {omega}{sub b}=0.08{+-}0.01, slope of the matter power spectrum at large scales n{sub s}=0.98{+-}0.02 and Hubble constant H{sub 0}=56{+-}4 km/s/Mpc. The data prefers a dark energy component with a dimensionless decay rate parameter c{sup 2}=0.005 and noninteracting models are consistent with the data only at the 99.9% confidence level. Using the Bayesian Information Criteria we show that this extra parameter fits the data better than models with no interaction. The quintessence equation of state parameter is less constrained; i.e., the data sets an upper limit w{sub x}{<=}-0.86 at the same level of significance. When the WMAP anisotropy data are combined with supernovae data, the density parameter of dark energy increases to {omega}{sub x}{approx_equal}0.68 while c{sup 2} augments to 6.3x10{sup -3}. Modelsmore » with quintessence decaying into dark matter provide a clean explanation for the coincidence problem and are a viable cosmological model, compatible with observations of the CMB, with testable predictions. Accurate measurements of baryon fraction and/or of matter density independent of the CMB data, would support/disprove these models.« less
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0517876d61cadcc64239203ac371d41ef2cd5979
Citations in the corpus
- The growth of structure in interacting dark energy models (2009, unknown): “[7–28]).”
- Observational constraints on an interacting dark energy model (2009, unknown): “…(see, e.g. Wetterich (1995); Amendola (1999); Billyard & Coley (2000); Zimdahl & Pavon (2001); Farrar & Peebles (2004); Chimento et al. (2003); Olivares et al. (2005); Koivisto (2005); Sadjadi & Alimohammadi (2006); Guo et al. (2007); Boehmer et al. (2008); He & Wang (2008); Quartin et al.…”