A Faith-Based Initiative Meets the Evidence: Does a Flexible Exchange Rate Regime Really Facilitate Current Account Adjustment?
By M. Chinn, Shang-jin Wei. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0500b957da9a69f06d136909e464aaec59a7f2a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
- M. Chinn
- Hiro Ito
- Barry Eichengreen
- Joshua Aizenman
- Jeffrey A. Frankel
- Davide Furceri
- Prakash Loungani
- Heikki Lehkonen
In Finance
- M. Chinn
- Hiro Ito
- Barry Eichengreen
- Joshua Aizenman
- M. Obstfeld
- Jeffrey A. Frankel
- Geert Bekaert
- Shang-jin Wei
Citations in the corpus
- A Forensic Analysis of Global Imbalances (2011, background): “Although Chinn and Wei (2009) show that the exchange rate regime does not affect the current account adjustment, it has been anecdotally argued that the type of the exchange rate regime affects the behavior of current accounts.”
- Exchange Rate Management and Crisis Susceptibility: A Reassessment (2014, unknown): “This suggests that in assessing the resilience of exchange rate regimes, it is important to 13In a recent paper, Chinn and Wei (2013) find that the nominal exchange rate regime does not matter for external adjustment.”
- Exchange Arrangements Entering the 21st Century: Which Anchor Will Hold? (2017, unknown): “…Aghion et al (2009) and Rajan and Subramanian (2005) on growth, Aizenman and Lee (2007) and Jeanne and Ranciere (2006) on reserve accumulation, Chinn and Wei (2013) and Ghosh et al (2013) on current account adjustment, Hau and Rey (2006) on capital flows and equity prices, Mendoza and…”