Favorable Estimators for Fitting Pareto Models: A Study Using Goodness-of-fit Measures with Actual Data
By Vytaras Brazauskas, Robert Serfling. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the International Actuarial Association, 2003
68 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04fa62edaa44264c2e4bb812e42daf6e281b8c93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
- Ricardas Zitikis
- B. Jones
- Maria L. Rizzo
- Andreas Kleefeld
- Madan Lal Puri
- Vytaras Brazauskas
- G'abor J. Sz'ekely
- Edward Furman
In Statistics and Probability
- Maria L. Rizzo
- Ricardas Zitikis
- B. Jones
- Andreas Kleefeld
- Madan Lal Puri
- Vytaras Brazauskas
- G'abor J. Sz'ekely
- Arthur Gretton
Citations in the corpus
- Estimating conditional tail expectation with actuarial applications in view (2008, background): “Practical aspects of fitting Pareto models to real loss data are investigated in Brazauskas and Serfling (2003).”
- Robust fitting of claim severity distributions and the method of trimmed moments (2009, methodology): “In contrast, using specialized derivations of robust estimators, some of the aforementioned applications have been studied by Brazauskas and Serfling (2000a, 2003), Kaiser and Brazauskas (2006), and Dornheim and Brazauskas (2007).”
- Modeling Severity and Measuring Tail Risk of Norwegian Fire Claims (2016, methodology): “For the purposes of parameter estimation, construction of quantile-quantile plots, and for computation of other model validation measures, such data clusters were de-grouped using the method described in Brazauskas and Serfling (2003).”
- New Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Pareto Distributions (2009, methodology): “For the wind catastrophes data, the scale parameter s = 1.5 was applied by Brazauskas and Serfling (2003) and Hogg and Klugman (1984); Philbrick (1981) applied s = 2.0.”