Perverse Incentive Structure and Policy Implementation Gap in China's Local Environmental Politics

By R. Ran. 2013

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04f67b716ca4674d3a8e351aae7459eff3e377eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Genia Kostka
2. Arthur P. J. Mol
3. Yan Yan
4. Tao Liu
5. R. Y. Wang
6. Guangzhong Cao
7. Jonas Nahm

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Genia Kostka
2. Arthur P. J. Mol
3. Yan Yan
4. Tao Liu
5. R. Y. Wang
6. Guangzhong Cao
7. Jonas Nahm
8. David Gibbs

Citations in the corpus

• Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism (2016, methodology): “The results of 2SLS 10 Studentized residuals can be interpreted as the t statistic for testing the significance of a dummy variable equal to 1 in the observation in question and 0 elsewhere (Belsley et al., 2005; Robbins and Birkenholtz, 2003).”
• Central–Local Relations: Recentralization and Environmental Governance in China (2017, background): “5 Ran 2013; Kostka 2014. complex picture of China’s environmental governance patterns during the current phase of recentralization.”
• Implementation and Participation in China's Local Environmental Politics: Challenges and Innovations (2013, background): “The first contribution analyses central–local relations (Ran, 2013); the second and third contributions look at implementation agencies and policies (Kostka, 2013; Liang & Mol, 2013), while the fourth and fifth contributions analyse public participation in local environmental politics (Johnson,…”