Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.
By A. Lacy, J. García-Valdecasas, S. Delgado, A. Castells, P. Taurá, J. Piqué, J. Visa. The Lancet, 2002
2,533 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04f5020d86ddf5dcab290526781a602ab2557ade
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- W. King
- C. Booth
- Y. Baik
- I. Choi
- J. Bae
- William J. Mackillop
- Dae Hyun Kim
- M. Raphael
Citations in the corpus
- Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. (2009, neutral): “Well–moderately differentiated 60/1060 (6) 28/526 (5) 32/534 (6) .”
- Improved Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial (2008, methodology): “The laparoscopic approach is now accepted as an alternative to open surgery for colon cancer based on data from well designed clinical studies.(18,19) For gastric cancer, Huscher et al(3) and Mochiki et al(20) reported that the 5-year survival rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastre”
- Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2011, background): “On a theoretical level, postoperative stress may impair the immune system and stimulate acute phase cytokines, such as insulinlike growth factor binding protein 3 and matrix metalloproteinase 9, that may enhance cancer cell growth biology and kinetics.(43,44)”