PSockets: The Case for Application-level Network Striping for Data Intensive Applications using High Speed Wide Area Networks

By Harimath Sivakumar, S. Bailey, Robert L. Grossman. International Conference on Software Composition, 2000

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Transport Layer Approach for Achieving Aggregate Bandwidths on Multi-Homed Mobile Hosts (2002, background): “different context where such striping is done on sockets that share a long-fat path and the goal is to fill the bandwidth-delay product of the path (which otherwise will be impossible without both ends supporting the window scaling option) [2, 17].”
BlueConnect: Decomposing all-reduce for deep learning on heterogeneous network hierarchy (2019, background): “• Higher parallelism at each stage can increase the band-width utilization (Sivakumar et al., 2000; Yildirim et al., 2016).”
Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks (2004, background): “There have been several proposals in this regard: striping at the application layer [3, 24, 49], at the transport layer [26, 37], and at the link layer [1, 17, 2].”
UDT: UDP-based data transfer for high-speed wide area networks (2007, methodology): “Parallel TCP [1, 56] and XCP [39] are two special cases: the former tries to start multiple concurrent TCP flows to obtain more bandwidth, whereas the latter is a radical change by introducing a new transport layer protocol involving changes in routers.”