Interpreting trade-related CO 2 emission transfers

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping (2020, background): “…(income-) and consumption-based accounting is highly valuable for informing environmental policies, evaluating responsibility for resource use and emissions (Jakob and Marschinski 2013, Schaffartzik et al 2015, Steininger et al 2015) and assessing the prospects for relative and absolute decoupling.”
Decoupling or delusion? Measuring emissions displacement in foreign trade (2018, methodology): “Jakob and Marschinski (2013) use a similar method to decompose the standard BEET, into four different drivers: (i) trade balance; (ii) trade specialization; (iii) average energy intensity of production in the entire economy, compared to that of trading partners; (iv) average carbon intensity of…”
Carbon emissions of cities from a consumption-based perspective (2019, background): “3A), which was mainly caused by the trade pattern and emission intensity [85,86].”