Illocutionary Force And Semantic Content

By M. Green. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04e3aa0b625ff1cc98560a071c35bf990a4cab75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Christopher Potts
2. Malte Zimmermann
3. Nicholas Asher

In Social Psychology

1. Christopher Potts
2. Malte Zimmermann
3. Nicholas Asher

In Philosophy

1. Christopher Potts
2. Malte Zimmermann
3. Nicholas Asher

Citations in the corpus

• Zum 'Wohl': Diskurspartikeln als Satztypmodifikatoren (2004, background): “In both cases, the presence of wohl indicates that the commitment is not absolute, but rather speculative in nature (Green 2000).”
• Strategic conversation (2012, background): “But they are not equivalent in (1); we interpret Bronston’s move (1d) as an indirect answer even if we know that Bronston believes the negation of its implied answer, making Bronston’s beliefs inconsistent with the dialogue’s interpretation.”
• The logic of conventional implicatures (2004, background): “These are presumably the examples Green (2000) has in mind when he writes that “according to a wide consensus presuppositions are essentially cancelable” (p. 461).”