Tree Boosting With XGBoost - Why Does XGBoost Win "Every" Machine Learning Competition?
By Didrik Nielsen. 2016
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04e182aa6d36f643a1aea18f3b9384a74538e6a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sung-Min Kim
- I. Mudawar
- Yue Qiu
- Deepak Garg
- Liwei Zhou
- Chirag R. Kharangate
- Souhaib Aammou
- Amal Asselman
Citations in the corpus
- Machine learning algorithms to predict flow condensation heat transfer coefficient in mini/micro-channel utilizing universal data (2020, methodology): “Including highly correlated varibles doesn‘t provide any benefit to model performance and are ften handled naturally by getting dropped in several tree based lgorithms [96] .”
- Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm (2021, methodology): “The impact of the XGBoost algorithm has been widely recognized in many machine learning and data mining challenges, where it has become a more commonly used and popular tool among Kaggle’s competitors and the data scientist of the industry (Nielsen, 2016).”