Throughput and delay limits of IEEE 802.11

By Yang Xiao, Jon Rosdahl. IEEE Communications Letters, 2002

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04d6556dd893c45261603040bf5e643f70e9b618

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Jangeun Jun
2. Yang Xiao
3. Hsiao-Hwa Chen
4. Abbas Jamalipour
5. Yang Xiao
6. Yue Yang
7. Tie-shan Li
8. Mihail L. Sichitiu

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Jangeun Jun
2. Yang Xiao
3. Hsiao-Hwa Chen
4. Abbas Jamalipour
5. Mihail L. Sichitiu

Citations in the corpus

• IEEE 802.11n MAC frame aggregation mechanisms for next-generation high-throughput WLANs (2008, background): “In spite of establishing novel techniques that theoretically can be used for higher data transmission rates, the throughput outcomes at the MAC data SAP are surprisingly low and in most cases, half of what the underlying PHY rates can offer [ 4 ].”
• Theoretical maximum throughput of IEEE 802.11 and its applications (2003, background): “Referenced publications [4–8], concentrate on the analysis of contention window sizes and qualitative performance of the IEEE 802.11 standard.”
• Performance analysis of priority schemes for IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs (2005, methodology): “However, these models [2]‐[ 5 ] are not for priorities.”
• A Survey of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Formation: Performance, Formation Control, and Communication Capability (2021, background): “The physical layer header overhead is at least 44 bits (i.e., 6 bytes) [175], the medium access control (MAC) header is 40 byes, the IP packet header is at least 20 bytes, and the TCP segment header is at least 20 bytes so that the header overhead is H = 6 + 20 + 20 + 40 = 86 bytes.”