Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring player movement distance during Australian football.
By S. J. Edgecomb, K. Norton. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2006
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04d59af66ebb8b2976b7e28649fd692b30fd7e49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Remco Polman
- Vincent G. Kelly
- C. Carling
- Peter G. O'Donoghue
- Macfarlane T U Scott
- Tannath J. Scott
- L. Nelsen
- J. Bloomfield
In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Remco Polman
- Vincent G. Kelly
- C. Carling
- Peter G. O'Donoghue
- Macfarlane T U Scott
- Tannath J. Scott
- L. Nelsen
- J. Bloomfield
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Motion Analysis in Elite Soccer (2008, methodology): “player movement distance during Australian Rules Football games,([24]) a number of ways were”
- Physical Demands of Different Positions in FA Premier League Soccer. (2007, methodology): “In addition, measurement error has been observed in methodologies to quantify distance covered with overestimations of approximately 5.8% in computer-based tracking and 4.8% in global positioning systems (Edgecomb and Norton, 2006).”
- The Validity and Reliability of Global Positioning Systems in Team Sport: A Brief Review. (2016, methodology): “Research has shown that intraunit reliability is good during simple linear and curvilinear running (13,16,30,31).”