Comparison of direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index in mature Norway spruce stands of eastern Germany

By R. Küssner, R. Mosandl. 2000

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. (2003, methodology): “…have compared plant area index as measured by indirect methods with direct LAI estimates (Neumann et al., 1989; Chason et al., 1991; Lang et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1993; Fassnacht et al., 1994; DufreÃne and BreÂda, 1995; Vertessy et al., 1995; Comeau et al., 1998; KuÈûner and Mosandl, 2000).”
Estimation of leaf area and clumping indexes of crops with hemispherical photographs (2008, methodology): “Numerous approaches of destructive and non-destructive LAI measurements have been developed (see reviews methods in Ross, 1981; Gower et al., 1999; Kussner and Mosandl, 2000; a g r i c u l t u r a l a n d f o r e s t m e t e o r o l o g y 1 4 8 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 6 4 4 – 6 5 5 a r t i c l e i n f…”
Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography (2004, background): “There are two main categories of procedures to estimate LAI: direct and indirect methods (see reviews of methods inGower et al., 1999; Kussner and Mosandl, 2000).”