Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism

By M. Spalding, L. Burke, Spencer A. Wood, Joscelyne E. Ashpole, J. Hutchison, P. Ermgassen. 2017

598 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Global coral reef related tourism is one of the most significant examples of nature-based tourism from a single ecosystem. Coral reefs attract foreign and domestic visitors and generate revenues, including foreign exchange earnings, in over 100 countries and territories. Understanding the full value of coral reefs to tourism, and the spatial distribution of these values, provides an important incentive for sustainable reef management. In the current work, global data from multiple sources, including social media and crowd-sourced datasets, were used to estimate and map two distinct components of reef value. The first component is local “reef-adjacent” value, an overarching term used to capture a range of indirect benefits from coral reefs, including provision of sandy beaches, sheltered water, food, and attractive views. The second component is “on-reef” value, directly associated with in-water activities such diving and snorkelling. Tourism values were estimated as a proportion of the total visits and spending by coastal tourists within 30 km of reefs (excluding urban areas). Reef-adjacent values were set as a fixed proportion of 10% of this expenditure. On-reef values were based on the relative abundance of dive-shops and underwater photos in different countries and territories. Maps of value assigned to specific coral reef locations show considerable spatial variability across distances of just a few kilometres. Some 30% of the world's reefs are of value in the tourism sector, with a total value estimated at nearly US$36 billion, or over 9% of all coastal tourism value in the world's coral reef countries.

Subfields: Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04be71ea5a37c00ae393cb000a7b51097a717d1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. A. Norström
  2. Emily S. Darling
  3. Nicholas A. J. Graham
  4. M. Pratchett
  5. S. Wilson
  6. K. L. Nash
  7. Nicholas Polunin
  8. A. Hoey

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. Nicholas A. J. Graham

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. J. Mair
  2. Emily S. Darling
  3. Lisa Ruhanen
  4. A. Phelan

Citations in the corpus