University Women's Acknowledgment of Rape

By Barrie Bondurant. 2001

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04b276312d38648afc3854a45eba9569e29b8c03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Health

Citations in the corpus

Rape and Seduction Scripts of University Students: Implications for Rape Attributions and Unacknowledged Rape (2003, background): “It is estimated that less than half of women who have had an experience consistent with a legal definition of rape are acknowledged rape victims ( Bondurant, 2001; Frazier & Seales, 1997; Kahn, Mathie, & Torgler, 1994; Kalof, 2000; Koss, 1988; Layman et al., 1996; Levine-MacCombie & Koss, 1986; Lit”
The Relationship between Rape Myths and Sexual Scripts: The Social Construction of Rape (2011, background): “Most of the research linking rape scripts to participants’ interpretations of their own experience as a rape focuses on female victims of sexual aggression (e.g., Bondurant 2001; Kahn et al. 1994).”
Calling it Rape: Differences in Experiences of Women Who do or do not Label their Sexual Assault as Rape (2003, background): “We did not further explore rape scripts in this study, nor did we explore differences between women who do and do not define their situation as rape in terms of personality, attitudes, or non-rape behaviors, since past research has consistently failed to uncover differences in these areas (Bondurant”
Risky Situation or Harmless Fun? A Qualitative Examination of College Women’s Bad Hook-up and Rape Scripts (2009, background): “In addition, sexual scripts, such as rape and seduction scripts, have been found to affect how individuals conceptualize unwanted sexual experiences ( Bondurant 2001; Kahn et al. 1994; Littleton et al. 2006a; Peterson and Muehlenhard 2004).”
Sexual Assault Victims' Acknowledgment Status and Revictimization Risk (2009, background): “edu The majority of college rape victims do not label their experience as rape, or even as a victimization (Bondurant, 2001; Fisher, Daigle, Cullen, & Turner, 2003; Frazier & Seales, 1997; Littleton, Axsom, Radecki Breitkopf, & Berenson, 2006), a remarkable finding given the prevalence of this crime”
Acknowledging sexual victimization as rape: Results from a national-level study (2003, methodology): “, Bondurant, 2001). Estimates of the number of completed rape victims and victims of other forms of sexual victimization were derived solely from responses to the SES questions. The SES is a self-report instrument composed of behaviorally specific questions that describe four types of sexual victimi”
A Match-and-Motivation Model of How Women Label Their Nonconsensual Sexual Experiences (2011, background): “In contrast to several other researchers, Bondurant (2001) found that labelers reported more self-blame than nonlabelers.”
Telling stories without the words: ‘Tightrope talk’ in women’s accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression (2011, background): “…least a half of women surveyed who report having experienced events that meet the legal definition of rape/sexual assault, do not label it as such (Bondurant, 2001; Gavey, 2005; Koss, 1985; McMullin and White, 2006; Pitts and Schwartz, 1993), and thus have been referred to as ‘unacknowledged rape…”
Barriers to Reporting Sexual Victimization: Prevalence and Correlates among Undergraduate Women (2011, background): “The most frequently observed rape scripts, particularly among unacknowledged rape victims, involve a White woman assaulted by force, with a weapon, and by a stranger assailant ( Bondurant, 2001 ; Estrich, 1987 ).”
Was It Rape? The Function of Women's Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences (2004, background): “In subsequent studies, the percentages of rape victims who did not regard their experience as rape were 73% (Koss, Dinero, Seibel, & Cox, 1988; Layman, Gidycz, & Lynn, 1996), 64% ( Bondurant, 2001 ), and 48% (Kahn, Mathie, & Torgler, 1994).”
Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates (2007, unknown): “For example, Bondurant (2001) reported that 64% of 109 college women endorsing SES rape items answered “no” on a survey item asking if they had ever been raped.”
Child Maltreatment, Emotion Regulation, and Posttraumatic Stress: The Impact of Emotional Abuse (2010, background): “There is evidence that even when endorsing or describing experiences of sexual abuse, women might refuse to label their experience as such or deny altogether that they were victims of sexual abuse (Bondurant, 2001; Kahn, Mathie, & Torgler, 1994; Koss, 1985).”
Long-Term Effects of labeling a Rape Experience (2006, background): “Other researchers (Bondurant, 2001; Layman et al., 1996) have reported finding no differences in labeling among rape victims in terms of their relationship with the perpetrator.”