How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale: A case study using fire and forest maps

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Seasonal drought limits tree species across the Neotropics (2017, methodology): “In addition, to assess whether the correlation between diversity and precipitation is robust to the potential influence of spatial autocorrelation we applied a Partial Mantel test (Fortin and Payette 2002), computing the relationship between the Euclidian distances of diversity and precipitation, wh”
Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data (2007, background): “It has been shown to influence both coefficients (for case studies see, e.g. Jetz & Rahbek, 2002; Lichstein et al ., 2002) and inference in statistical analyses (e.g. Chou & Soret, 1996; Fortin & Payette, 2002).”
Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology (2002, unknown): “The relationship between the two approaches is discussed in detail in another contribution in this volume (Fortin & Payette, 2002).”
The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data (2007, background): “This simple restricted randomization procedure that preserves the structure among pairs of sampling locations (Fortin and Payette 2002).”
Tropical montane forest ecotones: climate gradients, natural disturbance, and vegetation zonation in the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic (2007, background): “This lack of independence requires a reduction in the degrees of freedom as a function of the degree of spatial autocorrelation (Fortin & Payette, 2002).”