An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants : APGII

By Birgitta Bremer, K. Bremer, Mark W. Chase, Michael F. Fay, J. L. Reveal, D. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, P. F. Stevens, A. Anderberg, Michael J. Moore and 6 more. 2003

1,880 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0485cccbf8532b7180204e826f7e9bb0f031f034

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Moles
2. M. Westoby
3. J. Wendel
4. R. Cronn
5. R. Small
6. James F. Cahill Jr.
7. P. Smýkal
8. Olivier J. Hardy

Citations in the corpus

• Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants (2008, background): “…phylogenetic scales (Prinzing et al., 2001; Wiens and Graham, 2005), although niches and traits can evolve in a convergent or random fashion within many clades (Blomberg et al., 2003; Silvertown et al., 2006), meaning that close relatives are not always the most similar in structure (sensu Darwin).”